Director-General, Department of State Security, Lawal Daura,
A
human rights lawyer, Ahmed Adetola-Kazeem, said he has commenced
contempt proceedings against the Director General of the Department of
State Services, Lawal Daura, over the continued detention of an Islamic
cleric, Abdul-Ganiy Ibrahim, in spite of a court order.
The cleric, his then pregnant wife,
Muinat, had, on July 5, 2014, been reportedly whisked away from their
Ijoko, Ogun State home by unidentified gunmen, but they were later
traced to the DSS station in Abeokuta, from where Muinat was released
while Ibrahim continued to be detained.
Adetola-Kazeem had approached a Federal
High Court in Abeokuta to challenge the arrest and continued detention
of the cleric by the DSS without disclosing his alleged offence or
charging him to court.
He
had urged the court to declare that the continued detention of Ibrahim
for over four months, outside the period covered by the detention
warrant by the DSS, from July 7 to September 17, 2014, was an
infringement of Ibrahim’s right to dignity of person, personal liberty
and freedom of movement guaranteed by sections 34, 35 and 41 of the
constitution.
In its ruling on June 18, 2015, the
court, presided over by Justice F.O.G. Ogunbanjo, upheld the lawyer’s
argument and declared that the continued detention of Ibrahim by the DSS
without charging him or arraigning him before a court of competent
jurisdiction was a violation of his fundamental human rights.
The judge also declared that the
continued detention of the cleric by the DSS without informing him of
the offence for which he was being held and without allowing him access
to his lawyer, was a breach of Section 36 of the constitution.
Apart from ordering his immediate
release, the judge held that Ibrahim was entitled to public apology from
the DSS, in addition to compensation for damages in the sum of N1m.
“The 1st applicant is entitled to the
grant of general damages in accordance with Section 36 (5) of the
constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999,(as amended) for
the abuse of his fundamental rights by the respondents’ unlawful
detention and this court accordingly awards the sum of N1m to be paid by
the respondents to the 1st applicant.
“The court having found that the
continued detention of the 1st applicant is unlawful, the 1st applicant
is entitled to public apology from the appropriate authority or person
by virtue of Section 35 (6) of the constitution of the Federal Republic
of Nigeria, 1999,(as amended). I therefore order the respondents to
comply with Section 35 (6) of the constitution of the Federal Republic
of Nigeria, 1999,(as amended) and tender a public apology to the
applicant,” the judge had held, in his ruling in suit numbered
FHC/AB/CS/84/2014 filed by Adetola-Kazeem.
But the lawyer said all efforts to get
the DSS and its DG, joined as the first and second respondents in the
suit, to comply had been unproductive.
He added that his efforts to set eyes on
Ibrahim had also not yielded any result, particularly expressing worry
over the inability of DSS operatives to tell where exactly Ibrahim was
being kept.
“None of them has given me any positive
response. They are not even sure where he is. Those in Abeokuta said he
is in Abuja; those in Abuja said he is in Lagos. Anytime you ask them,
they would say give us his name and also send his picture, so that we
can ascertain if he’s with us because there a lot of them there,”
Adetola-Kazeem had lamented while speaking with our corresponding early
July.
But he said that the court order had been
served on the DSS authorities, accompanied with a letter June 25, 2015
addressed to the DG of DSS.
In the said letter, the lawyer urged the
DSS to obey the order of the court so as to save the image of the
organisation from being battered.
“Be it noted that your organisation
participated in this case from start to finish. You were represented by
Mrs. Aisha Gyang, all through the case up until the ruling on June 18,
2015,” the lawyer said in the letter.
However, speaking with our correspondent
on Sunday, Adetola-Kazeem said he had now commenced contempt proceedings
against the respondents for failing to obey the court order.
No comments:
Post a Comment